AI-native ATS for agencies and startups

One standard. Every stage held to it.

Pyro writes down what good looks like for a role, once. Then it holds every stage to that line and shows its work.

Scroll to learn more
THE PROBLEM

What “good” looks like for a role is never written down.

So every stage guesses. Not one of them can show its work.

He was in your database the whole time.

a guessDiscover
a guess
Arjun Mehta
Senior DevOps Engineer
applied 2024
rejected on keyword “platform”
Source
a guessScreen
a guessInterview
a guessDecide
01 · DISCOVER · WRITE THE STANDARD

Pyro writes the standard down once.

The posting is graded before anyone sees it. A biased line is quoted back, and the posting does not publish until it is gone.

Not flagged afterwards. Refused.

Discover
Source
Screen
Interview
Decide
7 criteria, written once
Kubernetes at scaleProduction ownershipDelivery reliabilityInfrastructure as codeCloud cost ownershipLeading a teamGo or Rust
Senior Platform EngineerJD engine · draft 3
grade
C / 48B / 74
publish · blockedpublish · enabled
REFUSED · line 14age-coded language
“We are a young, energetic team of digital natives.”
Salary range added · four essential requirements, listed first
02 · SOURCE · SEARCH WHAT YOU OWN

Thousands of CVs you already own, read for meaning.

Connect the shared drive you already pay for. The top match never used the job title. The line that qualifies him is highlighted, not inferred.

Found in 0.8 seconds. Missed for two years.

Arjun MehtaSenior DevOps Engineer

Owned the build and on-call for a 40-node Kubernetes fleet across two regions. Cut failed deploys from 9% to 2% over eight months by moving both regions onto Terraform modules and a single promotion pipeline.

applied 2024 · rejected on a keyword
03 · SCREEN · EVIDENCE, NOT A NUMBER

A score is a claim. Here is the evidence.

Four criteria evidenced, each with its line from the CV. Three not. Nothing is inferred from a missing word.

A question is an interview, not a rejection.

Arjun Mehta

Owned the build and on-call for a 40-node Kubernetes fleet across two regions. Cut failed deploys from 9% to 2% over eight months by moving both regions onto Terraform modules and a single promotion pipeline.

fit 0/100 4 of 7 evidenced
3 unanswered
Kubernetes at scale“40-node fleet”Production ownership“on-call”Delivery reliability“9% → 2%”Infrastructure as code“Terraform modules”Cloud cost ownershipaskLeading a teamaskGo or Rustask
What did the fleet cost do?Have you led a team?Go or Rust in production?
04 · INTERVIEW · AUTONOMOUS · ARIA

The interview that narrows.

A spoken first round, built from what the CV left open. ARIA does not accept a thin answer. What was the metric before, what was it after, what did you change.

Nobody’s opinion changed. The evidence changed.

ARIA · first roundArjun Mehta · live
ARIA04:02Deploys went 9% to 2%. What did the fleet cost do over the same eight months?
Arjun04:09It came down. We got more efficient.
ARIA04:12What was the monthly spend before, what was it after, and what did you change?
Arjun04:31We right-sized from 40 nodes to 26 and moved batch jobs to spot. Cost came down by a third.
cost ownership · evidenced · “40 to 26” · 04:31
fit 30/100
Kubernetes at scaleProduction ownershipDelivery reliabilityInfrastructure as codeCloud cost ownership04:31Leading a teamGo or Rust
05 · INTERVIEW · HUMAN-LED · COPILOT

Round two is yours. The copilot sits beside you.

A person interviews. Questions retire as they are asked, follow-ups are drafted from the answer, and the case is assembled in the room.

Pyro assembles the case. A person decides.

SIS. Iyerinterviewing
AMArjun Mehtacandidate
round 2 · 18:47
Copilot
askedTeam leadership: size, tenure, what you changed
liveGo or Rust in production
drafted follow-upHe credited the pipeline. Ask what the rollback rate was before the promotion gate, and who owned it.
case so far · 6 of 7 evidenced
advanced to round 3 · decided by S. Iyer
Kubernetes at scaleProduction ownershipDelivery reliabilityInfrastructure as codeCloud cost ownershipLeading a teamGo or Rust
06 · THE RECORD

Every decision shows its work.

Who decided, on what evidence, which model. Consent is a signed row. One screen, not a reconstruction.

One line, start to finish.

Record · ROLE-2291 · Arjun Mehta
whenwhatby
08-19 10:02consent signed · scope screening + ARIAcandidate
08-19 10:03fit scored 30 · 4 of 7 evidencedmodel v3
08-21 16:40ARIA interview · 11 min · 3 questionsvoice v2
08-21 16:52fit rescored 68 · cost ownership · 04:31model v3
08-22 09:15advanced to round 2S. Iyer
08-24 18:47round 2 · 6 of 7 evidenced · advancedS. Iyer
08-24 18:48candidate notified · portal—
Enforced at the database, not promised in a badge. EU AI Act · human oversight recorded on every decisionGDPR · erasure executes at the databaseEEOC gate · a biased line cannot publish, no role can overrideTenant isolation · row-level · PII encrypted at rest
07 · THE CANDIDATE

The same line, from the other side.

One global profile that follows you to every role. You see the same evidence the recruiter sees. Consent is yours to sign and yours to withdraw.

In 2024, a keyword said no. This time, he was asked.

18:52pyro portal
Somebody looked. You advanced.
Where you stand
Senior Platform EngineerBengaluru
Round 3 · Thursday, in person
evidence6 of 7was 4 of 7 before your interview
Your profileFollows you to every role on Pyro. Edit once, everywhere.
Consent
signed 19 Aug · screening + ARIA
Withdraw

Pay for usage and success, not seats.

AI runs and ARIA rounds are metered and written to the record. Success is billed on hires. Users are unlimited.

See it on your own roles.

Bring one open role and the drive you already have. We will run the whole line in front of you.